Minto, Rachel ![]() |
Preview |
PDF
- Accepted Post-Print Version
Download (379kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This article assesses the ability of the European Commission’s current approach to policy evaluation to evaluate gender mainstreaming and, in turn, other cross-cutting social agendas (Articles 8–10 TFEU). Taking European Union research policy as a case study, through our analysis, we reveal mismatches between current evaluation standards adopted within the Better Regulation framework and requirements for effectively assessing progress towards cross-cutting social objectives, such as gender equality. The article concludes with a series of recommendations to overcome the identified shortcomings. Our analysis constitutes a key contribution to the development of feminist scholarship on the post-implementation phase of the policy process.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Department of Politics and International Relations (POLIR) |
Publisher: | Bristol University Press |
ISSN: | 2515-1088 |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 20 December 2019 |
Date of Acceptance: | 1 November 2019 |
Last Modified: | 06 Dec 2024 01:45 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/127656 |
Citation Data
Cited 2 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |