Austin, Louise V. ![]() ![]() |
Preview |
PDF
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (171kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11 the Supreme Court redefined the standard of disclosure in informed consent to medical treatment, rejecting the application of the doctor-focused Bolam standard in favour of one focused on what was significant to patients. In Grimstone v Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust [2015] EWHC 3756 (QB), despite acknowledging a new standard now applied, McGowan J nevertheless used the Bolam test to determine liability for non-disclosure. This illustrates ongoing judicial deference to the medical profession and this case commentary explores that decision and its implications
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Published Online |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Cardiff Law & Politics |
Publisher: | Oxford University Press |
ISSN: | 0967-0742 |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 18 February 2020 |
Last Modified: | 06 Jan 2024 02:12 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/129499 |
Citation Data
Cited 1 time in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By ScopusĀ® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |