Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin ![]() |
Preview |
PDF
- Accepted Post-Print Version
Download (307kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper investigates journalistic discourses on “deepfakes” as the future of fake news. We analyze journalistic discourses on deepfakes over an 18-month period from January 1, 2018, when a GoogleTrends search demonstrates that the term first began to circulate, to July 1, 2019, shortly after an altered video of Nancy Pelosi, the US Speaker of the House, circulated on social media. Based on a comprehensive thematic analysis of English-language news stories on the topic, drawn from Nexis UK, we suggest that journalistic responses to deepfakes reveal deeper anxieties both about the future of the information environment and journalism’s role within this environment. Concerns that the audiovisual nature of deepfakes makes them inherently more believable than previous fake news forms leads to worries over the impending weaponization of deepfakes by resource-rich “bad actors.” At stake is the trustworthiness of media content, and journalists’ role in providing verified content to the public. We argue that journalists conjure up speculative worst-case scenarios around deepfakes – what we refer to as “conjectured specifity” to highlight the vital importance of journalism as a bulwark against fabrication and a defender of truth.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Journalism, Media and Culture |
Publisher: | Taylor & Francis (Routledge) |
ISSN: | 1751-2786 |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 23 March 2021 |
Date of Acceptance: | 19 March 2021 |
Last Modified: | 07 Nov 2023 22:21 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/139988 |
Citation Data
Cited 4 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |