Debatable sphere: major party hegemony, minor party marginalization in the UK leaders' debate

Hughes, Ceri 2019. Debatable sphere: major party hegemony, minor party marginalization in the UK leaders' debate. Communication and the Public 4 (3) , pp. 189-203. 10.1177/2057047319875863

Preview

PDF - Accepted Post-Print Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (941kB) | Preview

Abstract

The United Kingdom political landscape has historically been dominated by the two main political parties: Labour and the Conservatives. However, by the 2010 General Election, their vote share had dropped to 65%. The 2010 election also saw a new development enter the UK political landscape—televised leaders’ debates, which featured the leaders of the three largest political parties. Discussions before the 2015 General Election resulted in a decision to repeat the debate experiment, but this time, partly due to changes in projected vote shares, seven leaders were invited to the main debate. Using content analysis of the debate, this research questions the presentation of the debate as a deliberative event. Participatory parity was not achieved in the debate—far from it. Instead, the debate served to reinforce extant power differentials between the leaders of parties of differing political standings.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	Journalism, Media and Culture
Publisher:	SAGE
ISSN:	2057-0473
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	23 March 2021
Date of Acceptance:	20 August 2019
Last Modified:	01 Dec 2024 16:45
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/140031

Citation Data

Cited 2 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item