Germetaki, Theodora, Nicholls, Camille, Adams, Richard A ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
PDF
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (2MB) |
Abstract
Aim: To determine the concordance between plasma and tissue RAS mutation status in metastatic colorectal cancer patients to gauge whether blood-based testing is a viable alternative. We also evaluated the change in mutation status on progression. Materials/methods:RAS testing was performed on plasma from patients commencing first-line therapy (OncoBEAM™ RAS CEIVD kit). Results were then compared with formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tumor samples. Results: The overall percentage agreement (concordance) was 86.0% (86/100), which demonstrates that blood-based testing is an alternative to tissue-based testing. Reproducibility was 100% between three laboratories and 20% showed changes in their RAS mutational status on progression. Conclusion: These results show good concordance between tissue and plasma samples and suggest the need for longitudinal plasma testing during treatment to guide management decisions.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Medicine Centre for Trials Research (CNTRR) |
Publisher: | Future Medicine |
ISSN: | 1479-6694 |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 13 May 2021 |
Date of Acceptance: | 2 July 2020 |
Last Modified: | 08 May 2023 10:50 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/141030 |
Citation Data
Cited 5 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |