Dececchi, T. Alexander, McPhetres, Jonathon, Albayrak-Aydemir, Nihan, Barbosa Mendes, Ana, Chow, Elvina C., Gonzalez-Marquez, Patricio, Loukras, Erin, Maus, Annika, O'Mahony, Aoife, Pomareda, Christina, Primbs, Maximilian A., Sackman, Shalaine L., Smithson, Conor J. R. and Volodko, Kirill
2021.
A decade of theory as reflected in Psychological Science (2009-2019).
PLoS ONE
16
(3)
, e0247986.
10.1371/journal.pone.0247986
![]() |
![]() |
PDF
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (726kB) |
Abstract
The dominant belief is that science progresses by testing theories and moving towards theoretical consensus. While it’s implicitly assumed that psychology operates in this manner, critical discussions claim that the field suffers from a lack of cumulative theory. To examine this paradox, we analysed research published in Psychological Science from 2009–2019 (N = 2,225). We found mention of 359 theories in-text, most were referred to only once. Only 53.66% of all manuscripts included the word theory, and only 15.33% explicitly claimed to test predictions derived from theories. We interpret this to suggest that the majority of research published in this flagship journal is not driven by theory, nor can it be contributing to cumulative theory building. These data provide insight into the kinds of research psychologists are conducting and raises questions about the role of theory in the psychological sciences.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Published Online |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Psychology |
Additional Information: | This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License |
Publisher: | Public Library of Science |
ISSN: | 1932-6203 |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 12 August 2021 |
Date of Acceptance: | 18 February 2021 |
Last Modified: | 11 Oct 2023 19:46 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/143346 |
Citation Data
Cited 10 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |