Garbim, Jonathan Rafael, Laux, Caroline Mariano, Tedesco, Tamara Kerber, Braga, Mariana Minatel and Raggio, Daniela Prócida ![]() |
Abstract
Background There are potential barriers to using the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach in conventional dental offices, as many professionals assume that it is only used for field conditions. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the survival data of ART restorations in permanent and primary teeth when performed in and out of the conventional environment. Methods Searches were performed on PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Open Grey databases up to April 2020. Studies that evaluated ART restorations were prospective and had survival rate data were included. The risk of bias was evaluated by Rob 2.0 and ROBINS-I tools. Meta-analyses were carried out considering as outcome the survival rate of primary and permanent teeth. Subgroups analysis was performed for setting and type of cavity (occlusal or multi-surface). Results Thirty-four studies were included. For primary teeth, in general, the overall percentage of survival rate was not influenced by setting, ranging up to 71% in 12 months to 65% in 36 months. Similarly, for permanent teeth, the overall percentage of survival rate was not influenced by setting, ranging up to 96% in 12 months to 61% in 36 months. Conclusion ART is a feasible approach for field settings as well as conventional dental offices.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Dentistry |
Publisher: | Wiley |
ISSN: | 0045-0421 |
Date of Acceptance: | 15 August 2021 |
Last Modified: | 10 Nov 2022 10:58 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/148820 |
Citation Data
Cited 1 time in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |