Zajkowski, Wojciech, Bielecki, Maksymilian and Marszał-Wiśniewska, Magdalena
2022.
Are you confident enough to act? Individual differences in action control are associated with post-decisional metacognitive bias.
PLoS ONE
17
(6)
, e0268501.
10.1371/journal.pone.0268501
![]() |
![]() |
PDF
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (1MB) |
Abstract
The art of making good choices and being consistent in executing them is essential for having a successful and fulfilling life. Individual differences in action control are believed to have a crucial impact on how we make choices and whether we put them in action. Action-oriented people are more decisive, flexible and likely to implement their intentions in the face of adversity. In contrast, state-oriented people often struggle to commit to their choices and end up second-guessing themselves. Here, we employ a model-based computational approach to study the underlying cognitive differences between action and state-oriented people in simple binary-choice decision tasks. In Experiment 1 we show that there is little-to-no evidence that the two groups differ in terms of decision-related parameters and strong evidence for differences in metacognitive bias. Action-oriented people exhibit greater confidence in the correctness of their choices as well as slightly elevated judgement sensitivity, although no differences in performance are present. In Experiment 2 we replicate this effect and show that the confidence gap generalizes to value-based decisions, widens as a function of difficulty and is independent of deliberation interval. Furthermore, allowing more time for confidence deliberation indicated that state-oriented people focus more strongly on external features of choice. We propose that a positive confidence bias, coupled with appropriate metacognitive sensitivity, might be crucial for the successful realization of intentions in many real-life situations. More generally, our study provides an example of how modelling latent cognitive processes can bring meaningful insight into the study of individual differences.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Published Online |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Psychology |
Additional Information: | License information from Publisher: LICENSE 1: URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
Publisher: | Public Library of Science |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 6 June 2022 |
Date of Acceptance: | 3 May 2022 |
Last Modified: | 05 May 2023 14:32 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/150225 |
Citation Data
Cited 1 time in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |