Whitaker, Emilie Morwenna and Atkinson, Paul ![]() |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26405-5_15
Abstract
Reflexivity refers to the fact that the perspectives and methods of the social sciences construct the phenomena that are studied. Reflexivity is not a matter of choice nor is it a researcher virtue. Ethnographic research needs to take account of the various kinds and levels of epistemic reflexivity: disciplinary; methodological; positional; textual; and personal. We distinguish reflexivity—a condition of all research—from reflective practice, and from the individualistic claims for research virtue that are sometimes made in the name of reflexivity.
Item Type: | Book Section |
---|---|
Date Type: | Published Online |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Social Sciences (Includes Criminology and Education) |
Publisher: | Springer VS |
ISBN: | 9783658264055 |
Last Modified: | 10 Nov 2022 11:33 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/150970 |
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |