Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Immunodeficient patient experience of emergency switch from intravenous to rapid push subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy during coronavirus disease 2019 shielding

Morgan, Clare, Jolles, Stephen, Ponsford, Mark J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0236-1059, Evans, Kimberly and Carne, Emily 2022. Immunodeficient patient experience of emergency switch from intravenous to rapid push subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy during coronavirus disease 2019 shielding. Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology 22 (6) , pp. 371-379. 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000864

[thumbnail of coaci-22-371.pdf]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (312kB) | Preview

Abstract

Purpose of Review Welsh immunodeficient patients on immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT) who were considered high risk for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were directed to shield. Consequently, patients receiving hospital-based intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) quickly transitioned to home-based self-administered subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg). This evaluation aimed to assess patients’ perceptions and experiences and laboratory outcomes of emergency IgRT transition during COVID-19. Recent Findings A quick transition from in-hospital IVIg to home-based rapid push SCIg is achievable, however, patient IgRT administration preference remains key outside of emergency shielding measures. Summary Subjective self-reported experiences (n = 23) and objective immunoglobulin G (IgG) concentration (n = 28) assessments were prospectively collected from patients pre/post-IgRT switch. In total, 41/55 (75%) patients transitioned from IVIg to rapid push SCIg and all completed training to self-administer subcutaneously within 24 days. Twenty-two percent (n = 5) of patients preferred SCIg and 35% (n = 8) wanted to return to hospital-based IVIg at 6 weeks post-transition. Mean IgG levels were similar pre vs. post-SCIg switch (10.3 g/l vs. 10.6 g/l, respectively). Patients reported greater infection anxiety during COVID-19 and adapted behaviours to mitigate risk. Although a third of patients wished to return to IVIg following cessation of shielding, over time the percentage electing to remain on SCIg rose from 22% to 59%.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Medicine
Publisher: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
ISSN: 1528-4050
Funders: N/A
Date of First Compliant Deposit: 29 November 2022
Last Modified: 04 May 2023 12:08
URI: https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/152915

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics