Field, Clare and Jon, Ihnji ![]() ![]() |
Preview |
PDF
- Accepted Post-Print Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (305kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Standing electric scooters (e-scooters)’ rapid infiltration as a mobility option has left cities in the limbo of having to deal with regulation and planning for their sudden interruption. As the first city in Australia to allow e-scooter sharing, Brisbane is at the forefront of regulating their use in public space. We reflect on how e-scooter governance can be considered a continually (re) negotiated site of state-market interface, drawing insights from Lindblom’s science of muddling through, Dewey’s socially organised intelligence, and Leitner, Peck, and Sheppard’s discussion on contesting market domination/ modes of social regulation.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Published Online |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Geography and Planning (GEOPL) |
Publisher: | Taylor and Francis Group |
ISSN: | 1470-000X |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 4 January 2023 |
Date of Acceptance: | 16 April 2021 |
Last Modified: | 04 May 2023 05:48 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/153302 |
Citation Data
Cited 6 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |