Testing a strategy-disruption account of the list-strength effect: are sampling bias and output interference responsible?

Ensor, Tyler M., Bancroft, Tyler D., Guitard, Dominic, Bireta, Tamra J., Hockley, William E. and Surprenant, Aimée M. 2020. Testing a strategy-disruption account of the list-strength effect: are sampling bias and output interference responsible? Experimental Psychology 67 (4) , pp. 255-275. 10.1027/1618-3169/a000494

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Presenting items multiple times on a study list increases their memorability, a process known as item strengthening. The list-strength effect (LSE) refers to the finding that, compared to unstrengthened (pure) lists, lists for which a subset of the items have been strengthened produce enhanced memory for the strengthened items and depressed memory for the unstrengthened items. Although the LSE is found in free recall (Tulving & Hastie, 1972), it does not occur in recognition (Ratcliff et al., 1990). In free recall, the LSE in mixed lists is attributed to a sampling bias promoting priority recall of strong items and consequent output interference affecting weak items. We suggest that, in recognition, the disruption of this pattern through the randomization of test probes is responsible for the null LSE. We present several pilot experiments consistent with this account; however, the registered experiment, which had more statistical power, did not support this account.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	Psychology
Publisher:	Hogrefe
ISSN:	1618-3169
Last Modified:	24 Nov 2022 18:30
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/153402

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item