Fixing the stimulus-as-a-fixed-effect-fallacy in forensically valid face-composite research

Lewis, Michael ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5735-5318 2024. Fixing the stimulus-as-a-fixed-effect-fallacy in forensically valid face-composite research. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 13 (2) , pp. 306-314. 10.1037/mac0000128

Preview

PDF - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (717kB) | Preview

Abstract

Face composites from eyewitnesses’ memories are a valuable resource in tackling crime. Many studies have focused on identifying the best system to produce a nameable composite. In this article, it is described that how many of these studies do not provide reliable conclusions because they fail to treat the faces constructed as being a random factor and so make the stimulus-as-a-fixed-effect fallacy. Simulations are reported in which the statistical methodologies typically employed in these studies are performed on random data generated by a null effect. The first simulation shows that the typical analysis of variance (ANOVA) analysis in this field produces a significant effect (i.e., Type 1 error) 20% of the time. A further simulation shows that using generalized estimating equations (GEE) analysis (recently employed in this type of research) does not resolve the problem. Recommendations are made for the analysis of face-composite experiments to best evaluate and hence improve the quality of the face composites made by eyewitnesses.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	Psychology
Publisher:	American Psychological Association
ISSN:	2211-3681
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	25 May 2023
Date of Acceptance:	25 May 2023
Last Modified:	08 Oct 2024 11:27
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/159969

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item