What we say and what we do: the relationship between real and hypothetical moral choices

FeldmanHall, Oriel, Mobbs, Dean, Evans, Davy, Hiscox, Lucy ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6296-7442, Navrady, Lauren and Dalgleish, Tim 2012. What we say and what we do: the relationship between real and hypothetical moral choices. Cognition 123 (3) , pp. 434-441. 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.02.001

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Moral ideals are strongly ingrained within society and individuals alike, but actual moral choices are profoundly influenced by tangible rewards and consequences. Across two studies we show that real moral decisions can dramatically contradict moral choices made in hypothetical scenarios (Study 1). However, by systematically enhancing the contextual information available to subjects when addressing a hypothetical moral problem—thereby reducing the opportunity for mental simulation—we were able to incrementally bring subjects’ responses in line with their moral behaviour in real situations (Study 2). These results imply that previous work relying mainly on decontextualized hypothetical scenarios may not accurately reflect moral decisions in everyday life. The findings also shed light on contextual factors that can alter how moral decisions are made, such as the salience of a personal gain.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	Psychology
Publisher:	Elsevier
ISSN:	0010-0277
Date of Acceptance:	2 February 2012
Last Modified:	07 Jul 2023 10:45
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/160344

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item