The content of optometric eye examinations for a young myope with headaches.

Shah, Rakhee, Edgar, David F., Rabbetts, Ronald, Blakeney, Susan L., Charlesworth, Peter, Harle, Deacon E. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5888-0019 and Evans, Bruce J. W. 2008. The content of optometric eye examinations for a young myope with headaches. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 28 (5) , pp. 404-421. 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2008.00587.x

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Background: A recent review found standardised patient (SP) methodology to be the gold standard methodology for evaluating clinical care. We used this to investigate the content of optometric eye care for a young myopic patient with headaches suggestive of migraine. Methods: We recruited 100 community optometrists who consented to be visited by an unannounced actor for an eye examination and to have that eye examination recorded. The actor received extensive training to enable accurate reporting of the content of the eye examinations, via an audio recording and a checklist completed for each clinical encounter. The actor presented as a 20-year-old student seeking a private eye examination and complaining of symptoms suggestive of migraine headaches. The results of each clinical encounter were recorded on a pre-designed checklist based on evidence-based reviews on headaches, clinical guidelines and the views of an expert panel of optometrists. Results: The presence of headache was detected in 98% of cases. Eight standard headache questions were considered to be the gold standard for primary care headache investigation. Although none of the optometrists asked all of these questions, 22% asked at least four of the eight questions. Sixty-nine per cent of practitioners asked the patient to seek a medical opinion regarding the headaches. The proportion of the tests recommended by the expert panel that was carried out varied from 33% to 89% and the durations of the eye examination varied from 5 to 50 min. Conclusion: SP encounters are an effective way of measuring clinical care within optometry and should be considered for further comparative measurements of quality of care. As in research using SPs in other healthcare disciplines, our study has highlighted substantial differences between different practitioners in the duration and depth of their clinical investigations. This highlights the fact that not all eye examinations are the same and that there is no such thing as a ‘standard sight test’. We recommend that future optometric continuing education could usefully focus on migraine diagnosis and assessment.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	Optometry and Vision Sciences
Publisher:	Wiley
ISSN:	0275-5408
Date of Acceptance:	6 June 2008
Last Modified:	18 Jan 2024 16:15
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/165206

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item