Responding to the danger of wrongful conviction for historical sexual abuse: A case for resurrecting abuse of process for delay?

Greenwood, Holly ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4485-6527 2024. Responding to the danger of wrongful conviction for historical sexual abuse: A case for resurrecting abuse of process for delay? The International Journal of Evidence & Proof 10.1177/13657127241237909

Preview

PDF - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (353kB) | Preview

Abstract

This article examines the potential risk of wrongful conviction for defendants facing historical sexual abuse charges where there is substantial delay. This risk arises from problems with truth-finding based on witness testimony, challenges posed by missing evidence and the increasing erosion of procedural safeguards. This article considers two recent proposals for reform, including first, whether the Court of Appeal should be more prepared to revisit the factual basis of decisions in historical sexual offence appeals; or second, whether there is a need to strengthen procedural safeguards at trial through the doctrine of abuse of process for delay. This article concludes that, whilst there would be advantages to broadening the grounds for appeal, the criminal courts should be more prepared to stay substantially delayed claims for abuse of process where there is missing evidence. The current approach has the potential to be unfair and fails to protect those defendants who are most disadvantaged by delayed claims.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Published Online
Status:	In Press
Schools:	Law
Subjects:	K Law > KD England and Wales
Publisher:	SAGE Publications
ISSN:	1365-7127
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	19 March 2024
Date of Acceptance:	22 February 2024
Last Modified:	20 Mar 2024 12:31
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/167342

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item