Maryosh, Sally, Gwilym, Brenig, Lewis, Peter, McLain, Alexander D., Lewis, David and Bosanquet, David C. ![]() |
Abstract
Patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) typically enter either local or national surveillance programmes. Recent data suggest that elderly patients (e.g., those aged > 80 or > 85 years) with small AAAs are unlikely to come for treatment; either they die of other causes before reaching the aneurysm threshold (> 54.9 mm), or they reach the threshold but are not offered surgery because of their comorbidities.1, 2, 3 Surveillance in this patient cohort may not be cost effective; however, screening cost effectiveness models do not consider the removal of patients with subthreshold AAAs from surveillance.4,5 Apart from advising those with “very limited life expectancy” not to undergo surveillance,6 no guidelines exist on how to, or whether, patients should be removed from surveillance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the proportion of elderly patients with small AAAs under local surveillance who could be removed following consultation.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Medicine |
Publisher: | European Society for Vascular Surgery |
ISSN: | 1078-5884 |
Last Modified: | 21 Jun 2024 01:08 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/170008 |
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |