Perceptions of the impact of comorbidity on the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme: qualitative study with bowel screening participants and staff

Price, Delyth, Brain, Katherine ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9296-9748, Dolwani, Sunil ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3113-5472, Edwards, Adrian ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6228-4446, Hood, Kerenza ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5268-8631 and Smits, Stephanie ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7897-150X 2024. Perceptions of the impact of comorbidity on the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme: qualitative study with bowel screening participants and staff. Health Expectations 27 (4) , e14126. 10.1111/hex.14126

PDF - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (333kB)

Abstract

Introduction: The impact of multiple health conditions on bowel cancer screening is currently unknown. We explored the impact of multiple health conditions on bowel cancer screening perceptions, experience and clinical management decisions following a positive stool test. Methods: Semi‐structured qualitative interviews were conducted remotely with Bowel Screening Wales staff (n = 16) stratified by regional location and role and with screening participants (n = 19) stratified by age, gender and comorbidity. Interview topics were guided by the Common‐Sense Model. Results: Screening participants, regardless of comorbidity status, placed great emphasis on the importance of early detection of cancer and completing the bowel screening process. Screening staff emphasised comorbidities in the clinical decision‐making process; however, screening participants had low awareness of the impact that comorbidities can have on bowel screening. Participants describe how the presence of multiple health conditions can mask potential bowel symptoms and influence beliefs about follow‐up. Conclusion: Bowel screening staff try to individualise the service to meet participant needs. The potential mismatch in screening staff and participant awareness and expectations of the bowel screening and diagnostic process needs to be addressed. Clearer and more regular communication with screening participants could support the screening process, particularly for those with significant coexisting health conditions or facing time delays. The possible masking effects and misattribution of symptoms because of comorbidities highlight an opportunity for education and raising awareness for screening participants and a potential area of focus for discussions in clinical consultations and staff training. Patient and Public Contribution: Project funding included costs for patients and public contributors to be compensated for their contributions to the project, in line with current standards. A patient and public contributor was involved in the design of the study, including protocol development, and the interpretation of key findings and implications for patients, which are subsequently reflected within the manuscript.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Published Online
Status:	Published
Schools:	Medicine
Additional Information:	License information from Publisher: LICENSE 1: URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Publisher:	Wiley Open Access
ISSN:	1369-6513
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	3 July 2024
Date of Acceptance:	18 June 2024
Last Modified:	03 Jul 2024 09:01
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/170235

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item