Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Why media platforms police the boundaries of impartiality: a comparative analysis of television news and fact-checking in the UK

Morani, Marina ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7599-843X, Hughes, Ceri, Cushion, Stephen ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7164-8283 and Kyriakidou, Maria ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4053-5961 2024. Why media platforms police the boundaries of impartiality: a comparative analysis of television news and fact-checking in the UK. Journalism 10.1177/14648849241273599

[thumbnail of morani-et-al-2024-why-media-platforms-police-the-boundaries-of-impartiality-a-comparative-analysis-of-television-news.pdf]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (594kB) | Preview
License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License Start date: 7 September 2024

Abstract

This article explores whether different media platforms across impartial news media supplied the same level of scrutiny in how they fact-checked political claims. While prior research has largely focused on independent fact-checking organisations, the fact-checking practices of legacy media through a cross-platform perspective have comparatively received limited attention. The study develops new lines of inquiry into the fact-checking practices of legacy media, presenting one of the largest and most forensic cross-platform studies of fact-checking to date. It draws on a systematic content analysis of 355 items from fact-checking sites, including 689 claims and 1850 instances where journalists or sources interacted with them in 2021, and assesses how they were covered by a further 280 television news items. Our findings demonstrate that the selection and degree to which journalists and sources scrutinised political claims varied across media platforms, with television news less inclined to report and analyse policy claims than dedicated fact-checking websites. Overall, we argue that the editorial boundaries of fact-checking are policed by journalists’ interpretations of impartiality, which differ across platforms (in television news or dedicated fact-checking websites) due to a range of editorial factors such as production constraints and news values.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Published Online
Status: In Press
Schools: Journalism, Media and Culture
Publisher: SAGE Publications
ISSN: 1464-8849
Funders: AHRC
Date of First Compliant Deposit: 12 July 2024
Date of Acceptance: 9 July 2024
Last Modified: 04 Dec 2024 11:15
URI: https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/170555

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics