McDowall, Almuth, Doyle, Nancy and Kiseleva, Meg ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
PDF
- Published Version
Download (211kB) |
Abstract
This brief practice-focused paper reports on data relevant to the use of evidence and the provision of training to support knowledge and neurodiversity, which broadly refers to naturally occurring differences in neurocognition. We report on relevant data from 985 employees and 127 employer representatives collected as part of a wider study. Applying principles of evidence-based management (EBM) as a benchmark, we find that employers and employees disproportionately avail themselves of stakeholder perspectives, professional experience and judgment at the expense of building on scientific evidence. Internet searches are a ‘go to’ resource, and 11% of employers do not seek any advice at all. In-house training from colleagues and from those with lived experience are more frequent than specialist external training. We discuss implications for refining the principles of EBM to comprise policy and legal advice which is highly pertinent in a diversity context. We further call for more rigorous training on neurodiversity as a substantive topic, but also the evaluation and synthesis of evidence to inform genuine and value-driven inclusion strategies and activities in organisations.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Academic & Student Support Service |
Publisher: | Cyprus Centre for Business Research |
ISSN: | 2547-9202 |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 18 July 2024 |
Date of Acceptance: | 7 November 2023 |
Last Modified: | 23 Jul 2024 13:38 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/170648 |
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |