Deverteuil, Geoffrey ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3036-9303 2024. Response to Portugali: Seeing the forest for the trees. Dialogues in Urban Research 2 (3) , pp. 290-293. 10.1177/27541258241275924 |
PDF
- Accepted Post-Print Version
Download (177kB) |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/27541258241275924
Abstract
This commentary provides several critiques to Portugali's admirably ambitious paper on the utility of applying Bohm's scientific approach to unify the current disarray in urban studies. The critiques focus on incommensurability between science and social science, conceptual over-reach, and the value of diversity versus unity.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Geography and Planning (GEOPL) |
Publisher: | SAGE Publications |
ISSN: | 2754-1258 |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 7 October 2024 |
Date of Acceptance: | 2 August 2024 |
Last Modified: | 17 Dec 2024 15:15 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/172651 |
Actions (repository staff only)
Edit Item |