Hartt, Maxwell, Cantlay, Stephanie, Hollander, Justin B., Potts, Ruth ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8681-4309 and Seto, Alexander
2024.
iNIMBY? The potential of automated social media bots to create echo chambers in the online participatory planning discourse.
International Planning Studies
29
(4)
, pp. 436-448.
Item availability restricted. |
PDF
- Accepted Post-Print Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 25 May 2026 due to copyright restrictions. Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (385kB) |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2024.2433650
Abstract
Online participatory planning processes are cheaper, easier, and may reach a broader audience than in-person techniques. However, they are also vulnerable to disruption from automated social bots. This research introduces a bespoke planning-oriented social bot, Urbanist Uma, to explore if and how social bots contribute to echo chambers that may influence planning processes. After four years on Twitter, Urbanist Uma had almost 250 followers and her Tweets had been viewed tens of thousands of times. The high level of homophily in Uma’s network demonstrates the need for planners to recognize both the opportunity and risk of the digital public sphere.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Published Online |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Geography and Planning (GEOPL) |
Publisher: | Taylor and Francis Group |
ISSN: | 1356-3475 |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 25 November 2024 |
Date of Acceptance: | 19 November 2024 |
Last Modified: | 10 Dec 2024 16:00 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/174288 |
Actions (repository staff only)
Edit Item |