Alonso, Jose Manuel and Andrews, Rhys ![]() ![]() |
Preview |
PDF
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial. Download (495kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The corporatization of local public services is an increasingly common public management reform worldwide. This study investigates whether a shift from in-house to not-for-profit corporatized service provision can result in improvements across multiple dimensions of performance. To do so, we examine the staggered adoption of Arms-Length Management Organizations (ALMOs) to provide social housing by a third of English local governments during the period 2000-08. Utilizing a Differences-in-Differences (DiD) with Multiple Time Periods (MTP) approach we find that corporatized social housing outperformed in-house provision on service quality, citizen satisfaction and environmental sustainability, with little evidence of worse achievements on other performance dimensions. Event history analysis suggests performance benefits emerged around two years after corporatization occurred. Our study therefore implies that not-for-profit corporatization is potentially an effective strategy for improving local public service performance.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Published Online |
Status: | In Press |
Schools: | Schools > Business (Including Economics) |
Publisher: | Wiley |
ISSN: | 0276-8739 |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 1 December 2024 |
Date of Acceptance: | 1 December 2024 |
Last Modified: | 19 Feb 2025 15:30 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/174429 |
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |