Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Linguistic effects of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in patients with primary progressive aphasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Godoi, Diogo C., Pandiá, Eduarda, Rodrigues, Maria Eduarda, Araújo, Luísa, Barbosa, Marina, Alhwaishel, Khaled, Godoi, Amanda and McGonigle, David J ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9595-6352 2025. Linguistic effects of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in patients with primary progressive aphasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 176 , 106264. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106264

[thumbnail of 1-s2.0-S0149763425002659-main (1).pdf]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview
License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License Start date: 19 June 2025

Abstract

Introduction Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) has shown promising language improvements in patients with primary progressive aphasia (PPA). Yet, individual studies have not been sufficient to yield strong conclusions on its efficacy. Methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing tDCS against sham stimulation in patients with PPA. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases for eligible studies up to July 2024. Outcomes of interest included a performance in a range of language and cognitive tests. Summary data was extracted from published reports and pooled with a random-effects model using standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The protocol was registered in PROSPERO, CRD42024499012. Results We included 10 parallel and cross-over RCTs with 178 patients and 218 observations. tDCS yielded significant improvements for general naming (SMD 0.37; 95% CI 0.07 to 0.67; p<0.01) and spelling ability (SMD 0.65; 95% CI 0.10 to 1.20; p=0.02) There were no differences between groups regarding naming performance for trained (p=0.78) and untrained items (p=0.11), global language (p=0.28), working memory (p=0.15), semantic fluency (p=0.38), and comprehension (p=0.32). Conclusion In this systematic review and meta-analysis, tDCA showed benefits for performance in general naming ability and spelling in PPA patients. However, there was no significant evidence to supporting any effect of tDCS on other language functions.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Schools > Psychology
Schools > Medicine
Schools > Biosciences
Research Institutes & Centres > Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC)
Additional Information: License information from Publisher: LICENSE 1: URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, Start Date: 2025-06-19
Publisher: Elsevier
ISSN: 0149-7634
Date of First Compliant Deposit: 25 June 2025
Date of Acceptance: 14 June 2025
Last Modified: 25 Jun 2025 11:32
URI: https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/179324

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics