Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

The role of policy appraisals and second-order beliefs in public support for climate policies in the UK

Poortinga, Wouter ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6926-8545 2025. The role of policy appraisals and second-order beliefs in public support for climate policies in the UK. Climate Policy 10.1080/14693062.2025.2539977

[thumbnail of The role of policy appraisals and second-order beliefs in public support for climate policies in the UK.pdf]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Ambitious climate policies designed to reduce carbon emissions through behaviour change require public consent for their successful implementation, which is dependent on their design and the way they are appraised. The current study, involving a large UK-based sample (n = 2002), brings together research on policy attributes, policy-specific appraisals, and second-order beliefs to examine how they can help explain support for different types of climate policies. The results show that restrictive ‘push’ measures are supported far less than non-coercive ‘pull’ measures; financial measures are less popular than regulatory measures; and measures aimed at changing dietary behaviours are supported less than those aimed at energy and travel behaviours. It further finds that perceived effectiveness, perceived fairness and perceived levels of public policy support (‘second-order beliefs’) follow similar patterns and can explain support for the different climate policies. The study shows that both policy-specific appraisals and second-order beliefs mediate differences in support for the different types of climate policies. Furthermore, while support for the different climate policies is systematically underestimated by 18% and opposition systematically overestimated by 16% on average, the magnitude of pluralistic ignorance is smaller for push measures than for pull measures. The smaller perception gap for the less popular restrictive measures may limit the effectiveness of informational norm interventions in increasing public acceptance of these policies.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Published Online
Status: In Press
Schools: Schools > Architecture
Schools > Psychology
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
ISSN: 1469-3062
Funders: ESRC
Date of First Compliant Deposit: 31 July 2025
Date of Acceptance: 22 July 2025
Last Modified: 04 Aug 2025 11:31
URI: https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/180186

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics