Cox, Emily ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
PDF (Article)
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (773kB) |
![]() |
PDF (Supplementary materials)
- Supplemental Material
Download (1MB) |
Abstract
Biological carbon removal has been proposed as a ‘win-win’ for climate, sustainability and public opinion, but research on public perceptions is lacking explicit evidence on trade-offs between options. Here we explore perceptions using small group deliberation (n60) plus a nationally representative survey (n2027) in the UK’s four jurisdictions. We find a strong preference for carbon removal to play a substantial role in meeting national climate targets, stemming from persistent scepticism about emissions reductions and behaviour change. However, such support was tempered with caution about whether certain biological techniques - biochar, peatland restoration, and perennial biomass crops - would be “worth it”. In particular, concerns were raised about life-cycle emissions, as well as land competition with urgent housing needs, and scientific uncertainty around novel techniques such as biochar. While we find that responses to carbon removal tend to shift the burden of responsibility for climate action away from individuals, we also identify region-specific discourses, highlighting the importance of local context in shaping public views.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Published Online |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Schools > Psychology |
Additional Information: | License information from Publisher: LICENSE 1: URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, Type: open-access |
Publisher: | Nature Research |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 3 September 2025 |
Date of Acceptance: | 31 July 2025 |
Last Modified: | 03 Sep 2025 08:45 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/180850 |
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |