Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Erosion protection benefits of stabilized SnF2 dentifrice versus an arginine–sodium monofluorophosphate dentifrice

West, Nicola, He, Tao, Macdonald, Emma, Seong, Joon, Hellin, Nicola, Barker, Matthew L. and Eversole, Sandra L. 2017. Erosion protection benefits of stabilized SnF2 dentifrice versus an arginine–sodium monofluorophosphate dentifrice. Clinical Oral Investigations 21 , pp. 533-540. 10.1007/s00784-016-1905-1

[thumbnail of s00784-016-1905-1.pdf] PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (546kB)

Abstract

Objectives The aim of these investigations was to assess the ability of two fluoride dentifrices to protect against the initiation and progression of dental erosion using a predictive in vitro erosion cycling model and a human in situ erosion prevention clinical trial for verification of effectiveness. Materials and methods A stabilized stannous fluoride (SnF2) dentifrice (0.454 % SnF2 + 0.077 % sodium fluoride [NaF]; total F = 1450 ppm F) [dentifrice A] and a sodium monofluorophosphate [SMFP]/arginine dentifrice (1.1 % SMFP + 1.5 % arginine; total F = 1450 ppm F) [dentifrice B] were tested in a 5-day in vitro erosion cycling model and a 10-day randomized, controlled, double-blind, two-treatment, four-period crossover in situ clinical trial. In each study, human enamel specimens were exposed to repetitive product treatments using a standardized dilution of test products followed by erosive acid challenges in a systematic fashion. Results Both studies demonstrated statistically significant differences between the two products, with dentifrice A providing significantly better enamel protection in each study. In vitro, dentifrice A provided a 75.8 % benefit over dentifrice B (p < 0.05, ANOVA), while after 10 days in the in situ model, dentifrice A provided 93.9 % greater protection versus dentifrice B (p < 0.0001, general linear mixed model). Conclusion These results support the superiority of stabilized SnF2 dentifrices for protecting human teeth against the initiation and progression of dental erosion. Clinical relevance Stabilized SnF2 dentifrices may provide more significant benefits to consumers than conventional fluoride dentifrices.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Schools > Dentistry
Publisher: Springer
ISSN: 1432-6981
Date of First Compliant Deposit: 8 September 2025
Date of Acceptance: 7 July 2016
Last Modified: 08 Sep 2025 10:45
URI: https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/180912

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics