The invite study: incisional hernia prevention: prophylactic mesh from the patient’s perspective

Smith, Laurie, Knight, Laura, Meggy, Alun, Watts, Tessa ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1201-5192, Torkington, Jared and Cornish, Julie ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4360-4472 2025. The invite study: incisional hernia prevention: prophylactic mesh from the patient’s perspective. Hernia 29 (1) , 272. 10.1007/s10029-025-03463-z

PDF - Published Version Download (1MB)

Abstract

Purpose: Mesh-augmented abdominal wall closure (Mesh prophylaxis) reduces incisional hernia rates in high-risk patients. In spite of a large body of evidence supporting its efficacy and safety, use of mesh prophylaxis is low in the US and UK, possibly due to negative perceptions of surgical mesh(1-2). This study aimed to assess the acceptability of mesh to patients and determine factors that influence acceptability. Methods: Following ethical approval, a convergent mixed-methods study was conducted whereby patients who had undergone elective or emergency surgery (n=332) were approached to participate in a questionnaire assessing knowledge and opinions regarding mesh prophylaxis Semi-structured interviews were conducted in a subset of participants (n=12) and thematic analysis performed. Results: 120 questionnaires were returned with a response rate of 36.1%. The majority (61.8%) of participants had heard of surgical mesh, with half (51.7%) having a negative association, driven by the media. Half (50%) of participants had pre-existing concerns about mesh, however the majority (91%) felt mesh prophylaxis to be acceptable, findings which were echoed in the qualitative component. Analysis of interview data identified three themes: "Knowledge of mesh" and "Acceptability of mesh", which triangulated with findings in the survey data and "Shared decision-making", which explored how participants wanted to receive information about mesh. Factors affecting acceptability of mesh included the nature of information given to patients, and the way in which it was delivered. Conclusions: Despite negative pre-conceptions, mesh prophylaxis is broadly acceptable to patients. The results of this work will be used to develop patient resources to support mesh prophylaxis. Future mixed-methods studies identifying the surgeons’ barriers to use of mesh are needed to allow targeted implementation of prophylactic mesh.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Published Online
Status:	Published
Schools:	Schools > Healthcare Sciences
Additional Information:	License information from Publisher: LICENSE 1: URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, Type: open-access
Publisher:	Springer
ISSN:	1265-4906
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	9 September 2025
Date of Acceptance:	13 August 2025
Last Modified:	09 Sep 2025 10:45
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/181011

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item