Cabrales, Antonio, Drouvelis, Michalis, Gürgüç, Zeynep and Ray, Indrajit ![]() Item availability restricted. |
![]() |
PDF
- Accepted Post-Print Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 17 September 2026 due to copyright restrictions. Download (967kB) |
Abstract
We consider an experiment with a version of the Battle of the Sexes game with two-sided private information, preceded by a round of either one-way or two-way cheap talk. We compare different treatments to study truthful revelation of information and subsequent payoffs from the game. We find that individuals are largely truthful (about 80% overall) in revealing their types in both one-way and two-way cheap talk. Furthermore, the unique symmetric cheap-talk equilibrium in the two-way cheap talk game is played when the players fully reveal their information. However, they attain even higher payoffs in the game with one-way talk by choosing the desired coordinated outcome following truthful announcements, which deviates from the theoretical equilibrium.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Published Online |
Status: | In Press |
Schools: | Schools > Business (Including Economics) |
Publisher: | Springer |
ISSN: | 0938-2259 |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 17 September 2025 |
Date of Acceptance: | 1 September 2025 |
Last Modified: | 18 Sep 2025 14:45 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/181148 |
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |