The democratic dilemmas of differentiated integration: the views of political party actors

Kröger, Sandra, Lorimer, Marta ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9214-3898 and Bellamy, Richard 2021. The democratic dilemmas of differentiated integration: the views of political party actors. Swiss Political Science Review 27 (3) , pp. 563-581. 10.1111/spsr.12449

PDF - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (219kB)

Abstract

Differentiated integration (DI) appeals as a pragmatic way of accommodating political and economic differences among member states (MS). However, it potentially challenges their equal standing in EU decision-making, creating the possibility for some MS to dominate others. As such, it risks undermining the democratic legitimacy of the EU. Drawing on 35 interviews with party actors in seven MS, we find many shared these concerns, thereby questioning the acceptance of DI. While they considered DI could support self-determination at the national level, they worried it might result in arbitrary exclusion and growing inequality at the EU level. To be non-dominating, they contended differentiated policies must remain open for all to join, be based on clear criteria, and allow all MS a say, though only participating states should be entitled to vote on differentiated policies in the Council, whereas all MEPs should be able to vote in the European Parliament.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	Schools > Cardiff Law & Politics
Publisher:	Swiss Political Science Association
ISSN:	1424-7755
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	14 November 2025
Date of Acceptance:	19 February 2021
Last Modified:	14 Nov 2025 22:17
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/182305

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item