Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

‘Fair to us’: The use of legal myths in privately negotiated financial settlements in England and Wales

Crowe-Urbaniak, Donna L. 2025. ‘Fair to us’: The use of legal myths in privately negotiated financial settlements in England and Wales. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family
Item availability restricted.

[thumbnail of IJLPF - ‘Fair to us’ A.1 (1).pdf] PDF - Accepted Post-Print Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (324kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of Provisional file] PDF (Provisional file) - Accepted Post-Print Version
Download (17kB)

Abstract

Since the withdrawal of legal aid for private family law disputes post-LASPO, separating couples have increasingly been encouraged to resolve their own financial disputes through private ordering. Although over half of financial arrangements made by divorcees are settled by the couple themselves, limited empirical insight exists into how such agreements are negotiated and whether they achieve substantive fairness. This article draws on qualitative research with 32 divorced military wives to examine the role of legal myths in shaping privately negotiated settlements. Participants report relying on heuristic understandings of law – such as ‘fairness equals a 50:50 split’, ‘what’s mine, is mine’, and ‘his money, he decides’ - which diverge significantly from the legal principles of needs, sharing, and compensation. These myths serve to guide and constrain financial negotiations of separating couples, often at the expense of the financially weaker party. This article argues that such myths are symptomatic of broader neoliberal and gendered ideologies that underpin current family law practices. In light of current debates around reforming financial remedies law in England and Wales, this article calls for renewed scrutiny of informal settlements and considers whether privately negotiated financial settlements subject to greater judicial oversight might better promote fairness in family breakdown.

Item Type: Article
Status: In Press
Schools: Schools > Cardiff Law & Politics
Subjects: K Law > KD England and Wales
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISSN: 1360-9939
Date of First Compliant Deposit: 25 November 2025
Last Modified: 25 Nov 2025 12:30
URI: https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/182589

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics