Approximate analytical prediction on elastic properties of Diamond structures with varying porosities and orientations

Wang, Hao, Lyu, Yongtao, Jiang, Jian, Zhao, Feihu, Bosiakov, Sergei and Zhu, Hanxing ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3209-6831 2026. Approximate analytical prediction on elastic properties of Diamond structures with varying porosities and orientations. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology Item availability restricted.

	PDF - Accepted Post-Print Version Restricted to Repository staff only Download (2MB)
	PDF (Provisional file) - Accepted Post-Print Version Download (17kB)

Abstract

Bone scaffolds are widely used for repairing bone defects. As a biomimetic structure for bone scaffold, the triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) structure is an ideal choice. To evaluate / characterize the mechanical properties of TPMS structures, multiple methods (e.g., via experiment or theoretical analysis) can be used. Each one has its advantages and disadvantages. Using approximate analytical approach, the mechanical properties of structures can be predicted quickly and efficiently. Therefore, it is necessary to determine the applicable range to ensure that the calculated mechanical properties of TPMS structures with varying porosity and strut orientation are acceptable. In this paper, approximate analytical prediction on elastic properties of TPMS structures (i.e., Diamond) with varying porosities and strut orientations was investigated, and finite element (FE) method and theory of elasticity were compared with the approximate analytical approach. The ranges for porosity were from 70% to 90%. The ranges for orientation were defined by rotating the scaffold from 0° to 90° along the [100] and [110] directions, and from -30° to 90° along the [111] direction. Due to the cubic symmetry of Diamond structure, these angular ranges ensure that the structure is non-repeating and is comprehensively analyzed in all three directions. Additionally, experimental tests were performed to validate the feasibility of the non-experimental methods. It was shown from the experimental validation that the results from non-experimental methods were acceptable at certain porosities and orientations. FE method, which is commonly used and a convinced approach, was utilized to represent the non- experimental methods, comparing with experimental results. Therefore, the approximate analytical solutions and the results from elasticity theory were indirectly compared with experimental results The difference between the approximate analytical solution and the result from the FE and the difference between the approximate analytical solution and the result from elasticity theory were respectively 17.65% and 39.13%, when the porosity of the structure was 85%. Therefore, the approximate analytical solution was considered acceptable at a higher porosity. The acceptable ranges of the porosity for applying approximate analytical approach were higher than 85% in the [001] and [110] directions, and higher than 90% in the [111] direction. At the same structural porosity, in the (100) plane, the predicted results were acceptable when the structural orientation was close to 0° or 90°. In the (110) plane, the predicted results were acceptable when the structural orientation was close to 0°. In the (111) plane, whether the predicted results can be accepted or not was basically independent of the structural orientation, but depended on the porosity of the structure. The planes of (100), (110) and (111) are defined as the planes perpendicular to the directions of [100], [110] and [111], respectively. The data in the present study provide valuable guidance on applying the approximate analytical approach to efficiently predict the mechanical properties of TPMS structures prior to performing formal calculations and experiments.

Item Type:	Article
Status:	In Press
Schools:	Schools > Engineering
Publisher:	Frontiers Media
ISSN:	2296-4185
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	12 December 2025
Date of Acceptance:	28 November 2025
Last Modified:	15 Dec 2025 16:16
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/183169

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item