Giorgallis, Andreas
2025.
Restitution of objects unethically acquired during the colonial era: The intersections of public and private international law.
Chinese Journal of Transnational Law
10.1177/2753412X251399317
|
Preview |
PDF
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (799kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The restitution of colonial cultural objects has become the subject of increasing public and academic interest. However, all too often, the literature tends to focus on the public international law (PubIIL) aspects of the debate. With a few notable exceptions, the PubIIL and private international law (PIL) dimensions of the debate are rarely considered together. In conventional accounts, the two remain separate. Individually addressed, they only tell a fraction of the story. Against this background, and informed by growing discussions on both sides of the garden of international cultural heritage law, this article makes the case for a coordinated approach. It underlines how PubIIL and PIL have failed together but also how they could contribute positively to the restitution of colonial cultural objects in the future. This will be achieved by examining the renowned yet scarcely examined Ethiopian icon of Kwer’ata Re’esu (Christ with the Crown of Thorns). Thus, this article problematises the way in which the restitution of colonial cultural objects is conceptualised, contending that these objects do not belong exclusively to the realms of the public or private, national or international, but rather occupy a liminal space in-between these domains.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Date Type: | Published Online |
| Status: | In Press |
| Schools: | Schools > Law |
| ISSN: | 2753-412X |
| Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 15 December 2025 |
| Date of Acceptance: | 6 November 2025 |
| Last Modified: | 16 Dec 2025 09:45 |
| URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/183223 |
Actions (repository staff only)
 |
Edit Item |
Dimensions
Dimensions