Mahé, Isabelle, Haviari, Skerdi, Mohammed, Nassima Si, Højen, Anette Arbjerg, Font, Carme, Konstantinides, Stavros, Kruip, Marieke J.H.A., Maiorana, Luigi, Szmit, Sebastian, Abbel, Denise, Bertoletti, Laurent, Edwards, Adrian  ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6228-4446, Edwards, Michelle ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7432-2828, Gava, Alessandra, Gussekloo, Jacobijn, Johnson, Miriam J., Kumar, Rashmi, Langendoen, Johan, Lifford, Kate J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9782-2080, Mooijaart, Simon, Pearson, Mark, Portielje, Johanneke, Seddon, Kathy, Trompet, Stella, Helfer, Hélène, Klok, Frederikus A., Noble, Simon ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5425-2383 and Couffignal, Camille
2026.
Developing a decision support tool for the continuation or deprescribing of antithrombotic therapy in patients receiving end-of-life care: Results of a European Delphi study.
Thrombosis Research: Vascular Obstruction, Hemorrhage and Hemostasis
, 109573.
10.1016/j.thromres.2025.109573
|
Preview |
PDF
- Accepted Post-Print Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (325kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Introduction: To develop a European shared decision-support tool (SDST), a two-round Delphi process was used to achieve consensus on aspects relating to the antithrombotic therapy (ATT) deprescribing discussions and process in end-of-life cancer patients. Methods: Conducted between September 2024 and March 2025, the Delphi survey was developed by a multidisciplinary 24-member steering committee (SC), including medical specialists in oncology, hematology, palliative care, primary care, geriatrics, and vascular medicine. The survey involved 188 experts from these specialties across eight European countries. Consensus was defined with pooled items as ≥70 % agreement with a final decision by the SC. Themes covered deprescribing timing, stakeholders, reassessment and clinical drivers of patients with ATT, SDST, and choice of outcomes for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the SDST. Results: Round 1 reached consensus for seven pooled questions (37 %), especially the reassessment of ATT deprescribing. Considering these results, the SC reformulated round 2 to reduce ambiguity and move toward consensus. The SC made the final decision. Three medical specialties should be involved in ATT deprescribing: palliative care specialists, oncologists, and general practitioners after a triggering circumstance such as clinical triggers or at 3-month prognosis. For the SDST design, the findings confirmed that this tool would be meaningful to clinicians. Eleven predefined outcomes were selected for a future RCT. Conclusion: These results succeeded in shaping the content of the future SDST and mapping its useability in palliative care clinical pathways across Europe, with the perspective to support informed decision-making, reduce complications, and improve quality of life in this population.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Date Type: | Published Online |
| Status: | In Press |
| Schools: | Schools > Medicine |
| Additional Information: | RRS policy applied |
| Publisher: | Elsevier |
| ISSN: | 0049-3848 |
| Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 7 January 2026 |
| Date of Acceptance: | 25 December 2025 |
| Last Modified: | 07 Jan 2026 10:00 |
| URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/183601 |
Actions (repository staff only)
 |
Edit Item |
Altmetric
Altmetric