Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Intraoperative wound irrigation in orthopaedic surgery: a survey of current understanding and practice across the United States

Woodmansey, Emma, Buttacavoli, Frank A., Riesgo, Aldo, Bibbo, Christopher, Tedesco, Nicholas, Rodriguez, David, Lebby, Eric, Danoff, Jonathan R. and Carli, Alberto V. 2026. Intraoperative wound irrigation in orthopaedic surgery: a survey of current understanding and practice across the United States. Arthroplasty Today 37 , 101923. 10.1016/j.artd.2025.101923

[thumbnail of 1-s2.0-S2352344125003103-main.pdf]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (4MB) | Preview

Abstract

Background Periprosthetic joint infections remain a serious complication following arthroplasty surgery, causing significant patient morbidity and economic burden to health-care systems. While surgical site infection (SSI) preventive measures have shown effectiveness, there remains a significant gap in literature regarding surgeon intraoperative practice, such as the use of intraoperative wound irrigation (IOWI). While studies highlight the potential in reducing SSIs, variability in clinical application and the lack of standardized, evidence-based guidelines necessitate a comprehensive understanding of current practices. Methods A 46-question survey was developed following literature review and validation with high-volume primary and revision arthroplasty surgeons. Deployed via online clinician engagement platform, the survey queried challenges of SSI in relation to IOWI, current IOWI practice, the role of biofilm in periprosthetic joint infections, and ideal properties of irrigation solutions. Results A total of 112 orthopaedic surgeons across the United States participated in the survey. Respondents indicated a high level of knowledge regarding the role of IOWI in SSI treatment and prevention. Key attributes of an ideal IOWI varied depending on procedural step (exposure, instrumentation, implantation, and closure) and procedure type (primary or revision). Variation in IOWI practice was evident in irrigant selection and decision rationale, with relatively lower alignment to contact time and residual antimicrobial activity. Conclusions This survey highlights the perception that IOWI is an important part of routine SSI reduction measures and suggests variation in practice interventions and solution preference. Our findings support the necessity for a rigorous, evidence-based consensus via expert guidance to address the key surgical challenges to improve consistency of IOWI solution utilization.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Schools > Medicine
Publisher: Elsevier
ISSN: 2352-3441
Date of First Compliant Deposit: 9 January 2026
Date of Acceptance: 17 November 2025
Last Modified: 09 Jan 2026 16:39
URI: https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/183691

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics