Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Managing urban development for biodiversity: a cross-country analysis of local planning practices

Shahab, Sina ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3788-2564, Falco, Enzo, Kaplinsky, Eran, Lacoere, Peter and Wenner, Fabian 2026. Managing urban development for biodiversity: a cross-country analysis of local planning practices. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 10.1080/1523908X.2026.2618680

[thumbnail of Managing urban development for biodiversity  a cross-country analysis of local planning practices.pdf]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (800kB) | Preview

Abstract

Biodiversity conservation is gaining prominence in urban and regional planning, yet limited attention has been paid to how local authorities translate high-level biodiversity policies into effective practices. This paper examines how urban development is managed to prevent biodiversity loss and enhance ecosystem services through a comparative analysis of planning practices in Manchester (England), Bologna (Italy), Calgary (Canada), Frankfurt (Germany), and Ghent (Belgium). The study explores how biodiversity is integrated into planning across three governance levels: national/regional, city, and project. It reveals that while all five cities demonstrate a commitment to biodiversity, their strategies differ according to governance structures, planning cultures, and legal frameworks. Regulatory systems, such as those in Germany and Italy, provide prescriptive, plan-led approaches, whereas discretionary systems, like England’s, allow for more flexibility during project appraisal. However, these distinctions are not always clear-cut. Ghent, despite operating in a regulatory framework, adopts discretionary practices at the project level, resembling Manchester’s approach. Conversely, Frankfurt, Bologna, and Calgary emphasise early-stage integration of biodiversity through zoning and city planning. The findings offer insights into the advantages and limitations of both regulatory and discretionary approaches and highlight the importance of aligning biodiversity strategies across governance levels to improve ecological outcomes in urban development.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Published Online
Status: In Press
Schools: Schools > Geography and Planning (GEOPL)
Publisher: Taylor and Francis Group
ISSN: 1522-7200
Date of First Compliant Deposit: 12 January 2026
Date of Acceptance: 10 January 2026
Last Modified: 23 Jan 2026 12:45
URI: https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/183799

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics