Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Demonstrating the value for money of implementing evidence-based treatment: the case for further investment in magnesium sulphate as a neuroprotectant for preterm births

Sillero-Rejon, Carlos, Edwards, Hannah B., Hollingworth, William, Opmeer, Brent C., Pithara-McKeown, Christalla, de Vocht, Frank, Redwood, Sabi, Odd, David ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6416-4966, Luyt, Karen and McLeod, Hugh 2026. Demonstrating the value for money of implementing evidence-based treatment: the case for further investment in magnesium sulphate as a neuroprotectant for preterm births. Frontiers in Health Services 5 , 1655385. 10.3389/frhs.2025.1655385

[thumbnail of frhs-5-1655385.pdf] PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB)

Abstract

Background: Effective and cost-effective treatments are not always optimally implemented. The benefit forgone due to sub-optimal implementation is often not considered or estimated. We use the economic concept of “incremental net monetary benefit” (INMB) to demonstrate how this can be valued. This approach can inform decision-making when used to estimate the value for money of potential future quality improvement (QI) programmes. We illustrate these analyses using the case of antenatal magnesium sulphate (MgSO4), a cost-effective treatment for the prevention of cerebral palsy in preterm births. We estimate the optimal implementation of MgSO4, the INMB lost due to sub-optimal implementation, and the value of future implementation initiatives to increase the use of MgSO4. Methods: We estimated MgSO4 treatment implementation for babies under 32 weeks' gestation using routine data on its uptake between 2014 and 2022 in England, Scotland, and Wales. The optimal uptake level of MgSO4 was estimated using clinical judgment. The societal lifetime INMB of MgSO4 for the prevention of cerebral palsy in preterm births was obtained from the literature. The INMB of sub-optimal implementation over time was estimated as the difference between optimal and actual uptake over time in each country. We estimated the cost-effectiveness of a hypothetical future QI programme based on different scenarios of implementation effectiveness and costs. Results: The optimal uptake of MgSO4 was 95%. The INMB forgone associated with sub-optimal MgSO4 uptake has reduced over time, as uptake has increased. However, in 2022, the societal lifetime INMB forgone was still £18.2 m in England, £3.7 m in Scotland, and £1.0 m in Wales. A future QI programme across all three countries achieving a 5% increase in MgSO4 uptake over one year, and costing £987,500 to implement, would be cost-effective; generating £7.5 m in INMB. Future implementation initiatives are likely to be cost-effective within a range of different implementation effectiveness and costs. Conclusions: The case of MgSO4 treatment for preterm birth illustrates how sub-optimal implementation of evidence-based interventions can be associated with high opportunity costs measured as INMB forgone. This approach provides valuable quantification of the value for money of future QI programmes to improve the implementation of these interventions.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Schools > Medicine
Publisher: Frontiers Media
ISSN: 2813-0146
Date of First Compliant Deposit: 19 January 2026
Date of Acceptance: 5 December 2025
Last Modified: 19 Jan 2026 12:00
URI: https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/183992

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics