Repurposing gas power stations for modular nuclear and hydrogen systems: a techno-economic assessment

He, Ruiyang ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9643-9485, Wu, Jianzhong ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7928-3602 and Yao, Shuai ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7202-7961 2027. Repurposing gas power stations for modular nuclear and hydrogen systems: a techno-economic assessment. Applied Energy 427 (Part C) , 128875. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2026.128875

PDF - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (2MB)

Abstract

In the UK, many fossil-fuel power stations are approaching retirement, yet these sites retain valuable brownfield assets, notably developed industrial land and high-capacity grid connections, and can be repurposed for low-carbon generation. Repurposing such sites for low-carbon generation could therefore offer three linked advantages: lower upfront capital requirements through reuse of grid connections and developed industrial land; shorter project delivery times by reducing permitting needs and avoiding lengthy grid-connection queues; and higher system value through the provision of dispatchable flexibility and improved asset utilisation. This study examines repurposing end-of-life gas power stations into modular nuclear plants and further enabling hydrogen integration via high-temperature electrolysis, where the electricity-heat split is governed by endogenous reactor choice. A repurposing-oriented optimisation framework is proposed to embed inherited brownfield constraints, particularly land availability and grid-export limits, while co-optimising technology selection with hourly unit commitment and economic dispatch. Under the selected representative-week simulations, results show that the repurposed modular nuclear can deliver system-level flexibility comparable to that of gas turbines while meeting brownfield constraints. Nuclear‑hydrogen integration further increases reactor utilisation by using co-located electrolysis as a flexible local demand for nuclear-derived electricity and heat, eliminating renewable curtailment and substantially reducing plant-level levelised cost of electricity (LCOE) relative to power-only repurposing under these simulations. Among the electrolyser options, high-temperature electrolysis coupling gives the lowest plant-level levelised cost of hydrogen (LCOH), while producing the largest hydrogen output with the lowest plant-level upfront investment. This advantage arises from the ability of high-temperature electrolysis to use both electricity and cost-effective nuclear heat, reducing reliance on electricity-priced input energy. Sensitivity analysis identifies nuclear and high-temperature electrolyser capital costs as the main upward cost drivers, while stack lifetime remains the key durability-related lever. Overall, the findings indicate that brownfield nuclear‑hydrogen integration can provide a valuable pathway for converting retiring thermal power station sites into flexible low-carbon power and hydrogen production assets.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	Schools > Engineering
Publisher:	Elsevier
ISSN:	0306-2619
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	6 October 2026
Date of Acceptance:	15 September 2026
Last Modified:	06 Oct 2026 11:00
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/190033

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item