Priaulx, Nicolette Michelle ![]() |
Abstract
In Tysiac v. Poland (2007) the Strasbourg Court ruled in favour of the applicant (who had been denied access to a lawful therapeutic abortion), finding that Poland had failed to comply with its positive obligations to safeguard the applicant's right to effective respect for her private life under Article 8. Exploring this controversial judgment, the author assesses the claim that Tysiac marks a 'radical shift' on the part of the Court in creating a 'right to abortion'. The author argues that while Tysiac makes an important addition to abortion jurisprudence, the notion it founds such a 'right' greatly overstates the legal significance of this case.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Schools > Law |
Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) R Medicine > R Medicine (General) R Medicine > RG Gynecology and obstetrics |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Abortion ; Therapeutic abortion ; ECtHR ; Article 8 |
Publisher: | Brill |
ISSN: | 0929-0273 |
Last Modified: | 06 May 2023 02:13 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/19991 |
Citation Data
Cited 13 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |