Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: managing paradoxes of innovation

Andriopoulos, Constantine and Lewis, Marianne W. 2009. Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science 20 (4) , pp. 696-717. 10.1287/orsc.1080.0406

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Achieving exploitation and exploration enables success, even survival, but raises challenging tensions. Ambidextrous organizations excel at exploiting existing products to enable incremental innovation and at exploring new opportunities to foster more radical innovation, yet related research is limited. Largely conceptual, anecdotal, or single case studies offer architectural or contextual approaches. Architectural ambidexterity proposes dual structures and strategies to differentiate efforts, focusing actors on one or the other form of innovation. In contrast, contextual approaches use behavioral and social means to integrate exploitation and exploration. To develop a more comprehensive model, we sought to learn from five, ambidextrous firms that lead the product design industry. Results offer an alternative framework for examining exploitation-exploration tensions and their management. More specifically, we present nested paradoxes of innovation: strategic intent (profit-breakthroughs), customer orientation (tight-loose coupling), and personal drivers (discipline-passion). Building from innovation and paradox literature, we theorize how integration and differentiation tactics help manage these interwoven paradoxes and fuel virtuous cycles of ambidexterity. Further, managing paradoxes becomes a shared responsibility, not only of top management, but across organizational levels.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	Business (Including Economics)
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD28 Management. Industrial Management H Social Sciences > HF Commerce
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Innovation; Organizational ambidexterity; Paradox; Tensions
Publisher:	informs
ISSN:	1047-7039
Last Modified:	19 Mar 2016 22:39
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/22829

Citation Data

Cited 1205 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item