Giske, C. G., Sundsfjord, A. S., Kahlmeter, G., Woodford, N., Nordmann, P., Paterson, D. L., Canton, R. and Walsh, Timothy Rutland ![]() |
Abstract
Recently, we proposed a modified β-lactamase scheme for extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) in recognition of the fact that this term is no longer sufficient to encapsulate accurately all β-lactamases possessing extended-spectrum activity and therefore requires refining.1 Our proposal was mainly based on a clinical perspective emphasizing the need for smooth communication between various groups of healthcare professionals. Accepting that such a proposal would be controversial, nonetheless we do not seek to polarize the ‘β-lactamase community’, but to stimulate dialogue on the merits of existing classifications and to explore necessary improvements. In reply to our proposal, Bush et al.2 raise a number of points that we wish to respond to:
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Medicine Systems Immunity Research Institute (SIURI) |
Subjects: | R Medicine > R Medicine (General) |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | ESBLs, AmpC, carbapenemases |
Publisher: | Oxford University Press |
ISSN: | 0305-7453 |
Last Modified: | 20 Oct 2022 07:54 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/26850 |
Citation Data
Cited 3 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |