Doyle, John R., Chen, Catherine Huirong and Savani, Krishna 2010. Confounding in intertemporal choice designs: new sampling methods for exponential, arithmetic, and hyperbolic discounting. [Working Paper]. Social Science Research Network. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1639544 |
Abstract
We examine the confounding between models of intertemporal choice. Critical outputs from hyperbolic, exponential and arithmetic discounting are all highly multicolinear in commonly used research designs. This confounding means that if one model defines a participant as impulsive, they all will: not because the models are intrinsically related, but for lack of design in the stimuli to detect their differences. Also, confounding makes it difficult to detect which model(s) people actually use, and in what circumstances. We develop methods to overcome the problem, and provide extensive tables of over 8,000 choice questions generated according to these principles, so that the degree of separation between models can be controlled. Researchers may copy and paste the questions out of the .pdf into Word, say, for further processing. We give instructions how best to sample the database of questions and/or construct alternative sampling designs.
Item Type: | Monograph (Working Paper) |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Business (Including Economics) |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory H Social Sciences > HG Finance Q Science > QA Mathematics |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Intertemporal choice ; Confounding ; Sampling ; Delay discounting ; Time preference ; Behavioral finance |
Publisher: | Social Science Research Network |
ISSN: | 1556-5068 |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2019 03:29 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/27468 |
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |