Is this what the debate on rules was about? Commentary on Pothos, E.

Hahn, Ulrike 2005. Is this what the debate on rules was about? Commentary on Pothos, E. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1) , pp. 25-26. 10.1017/S0140525X05340015

Preview

PDF - Published Version Download (524kB) | Preview

Abstract

The key weakness of the proposed distinction between rules and similarity is that it effectively converts what was previously seen as a consequence of rule or similarity-based processing, into a definition of rule and similarity themselves – evidence is elevated into a conceptual distinction. This conflicts with fundamental intuitions about processes and erodes the relevance of the debate across cognitive science.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	Schools > Psychology
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Additional Information:	Pdf uploaded in accordance with publisher's policy at http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/0140-525X/ (accessed 21/02/2014).
Publisher:	Cambridge University Press
ISSN:	0140-525X
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	30 March 2016
Last Modified:	05 May 2023 13:46
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/33082

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item