Pearce, John Martindale ![]() |
Abstract
In 4 experiments, pigeons received autoshaping with various combinations of three stimuli, A, B, and C, before test trials in which responding during all three stimuli, ABC, was compared with that during a three-element control compound, DEF, which had been consistently paired with food. Pairing A, B, and C individually with food resulted in similar rates of responding during ABC and DEF (Experiments 1 and 2). Responding was faster, however, during ABC than during DEF after training in which food was signaled by the pairs of stimuli (AB, AC, and BC; Experiment 1). Responding was also faster during ABC than during DEF after training involving reinforced ( +) and nonreinforced (°) trials of the form ABC + A° BC°, followed by A + BC + (Experiment 2), or AB + BC + B° (Experiments 3 and 4). The results are consistent with those of a configural analysis of summation.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Psychology |
Publisher: | American Psychological Association |
ISSN: | 0097-7403 |
Last Modified: | 21 Oct 2022 08:48 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/34426 |
Citation Data
Cited 40 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |