Hahn, Ulrike and Nakisa, Ramin Charles 2000. German Inflection: Single Route or Dual Route? Cognitive Psychology 41 (4) , pp. 313-360. 10.1006/cogp.2000.0737 |
Abstract
The German plural system has recently become a focal point for conflicting theories of language, both linguistic and cognitive. Marcus et al. (1995) highlight the German plural as support for the dual-route account of inflectional morphology first proposed by Pinker and colleagues (Pinker & Prince, 1988). On the dual-route account, inflectional morphology is universally subserved by a symbolic rule route which deals with regular inflection and an associative memory component which deals with irregular inflection. This contrasts with single-route connectionist systems. We seek to counter supposed evidence for the dual-route account through large-scale simulations as well as through experimental data. We argue that, in its current form, the dual-route account is incapable of generating experimental data provided by Marcus et al. (1995) as support. Finally, we provide direct quantitative comparisons between single-route and dual-route models of German plural inflection and find single-route performance superior on these tests.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Psychology |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry |
Publisher: | Elsevier |
ISSN: | 0010-0285 |
Last Modified: | 19 Mar 2016 23:00 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/35153 |
Citation Data
Cited 89 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By ScopusĀ® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |