Court, Helen Jane, Ryan, Barbara, Bunce, C. and Margrain, Thomas Hengist ![]() |
Abstract
Aims: To determine if there was a significant difference between user-centred and clinical outcomes in people with low vision who attended a new community-based low vision service (CLVS) or the hospital-based low vision service (HBLV). Methods: A prospective controlled before and after study. Participants were recruited from the CLVS (n=343; 96 male, 247 female; median age 82 years) and from the HLVS (n=145; 55 male, 90 female; median age 80 years). The primary outcome measure was change (baseline to 3 months) in visual disability as evaluated by the seven-item National Eye Institute-Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ). Secondary outcome measures included: use of low vision aids, satisfaction with the service provided and change in near visual acuity before and after the provision of low vision aids. Results: There were no significant differences in user-centred and clinical outcome measures between the CLVS and HLVS. Self-reported visual disability was significantly reduced after low vision service intervention for participants in both groups by 0.46 and 0.57 logits in the HLVS and CLVS, respectively. Conclusion: This study provides strong evidence that CLVS and HLVS are effective methods of service provision in Wales.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Optometry and Vision Sciences |
Subjects: | R Medicine > RE Ophthalmology |
Publisher: | BMJ Publishing Group |
ISSN: | 0007-1161 |
Last Modified: | 21 Oct 2022 09:29 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/36677 |
Citation Data
Cited 22 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |