Doyle, John R., Green, R. H. and Cook, W. D. 1995. Upper and lower bound evaluation of multiattribute objects: Comparison models using linear programming. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 64 (3) , pp. 261-273. 10.1006/obhd.1995.1104 |
Abstract
We argue that three points of comparison which people use in everyday thinking are: comparison of an object relative to the next best object; relative to the average object; or relative to the worst object. We present formal models of comparison, based on linear programming, for multiattribute objects. We present upper and lower bound evaluations for each type of comparison: that is, relative to each of the three natural points of comparison we may determine an object′s most favorable standing, and its least favorable. The six models are illustrated with an example. Potential applications in marketing, decision analysis, social cognition, and negotiation are briefly sketched.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Business (Including Economics) |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) Q Science > QA Mathematics > QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science |
Publisher: | Elsevier |
ISSN: | 0749-5978 |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2019 03:30 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/37799 |
Citation Data
Cited 24 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |