The judge, the model of the judge, and the model of the judged as judge: Analyses of the UK 1992 research assessment exercise data for business and management studies

Doyle, John R., Arthurs, A. J., Green, R. H., McAulay, L., Pitt, M. R., Bottomley, Paul Andrew ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8131-6768 and Evans, W. 1996. The judge, the model of the judge, and the model of the judged as judge: Analyses of the UK 1992 research assessment exercise data for business and management studies. OMEGA -The International Journal of Management Science. 24 (1) , pp. 13-28. 10.1016/0305-0483(95)00044-5

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

This paper examines the judgments (part of a multi-million pound government-sponsored resource allocation exercise) made by a panel of experts about the research rating of UK business schools during 1988–1992. We use policy capture to determine, and critically evaluate, how business schools were judged. We suggest methods to improve the process of judgment-principally, using DEA as an idealized model whereby the judged institutions judge themselves, consistent with policy constraints.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	Business (Including Economics)
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB2300 Higher Education
Uncontrolled Keywords:	research assessment exercise; research evaluation; policy capture; decision bootstrapping; data envelopment analysis; judgment
Publisher:	Elsevier
ISSN:	0305-0483
Last Modified:	21 Oct 2022 09:48
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/37800

Citation Data

Cited 21 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item