Gray, Richard ![]() |
Abstract
According to Tye’s PANIC theory of consciousness, perceptualstates of creatures which are related to a disjunction ofexternal contents will fail to represent sensorily, andthereby fail to be conscious states. In this paper I argue that heat perception, a form of perception neglected in the recent literature, serves as a counterexample to Tye’s radical externalist claim. Having laid out Tye’s `absentqualia’ scenario, the PANIC theory from which it derives and the case of heat perception as a counterexample, I defend the putative counterexample against three possible responses: (1) that heat perception represents general(i.e. non-disjunctive) intrinsic properties of objects,(2) that heat perception represents the non-specific heat energy that is transferred between a subject’s body and another body and (3) that heat perception exclusively represents heat properties of the subject’s own body.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | English, Communication and Philosophy |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General) |
Publisher: | Springer |
ISSN: | 0031-8116 |
Last Modified: | 06 Jan 2024 03:06 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/3783 |
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |