Beynon, Malcolm James ![]() |
Abstract
The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) introduced by T.L. Saaty is a well known and popular method of multi-criteria decision making. Central to this method are the pairwise comparisons between criteria (and decision alternatives) made using a 9-unit scale. The appropriateness of Saaty's original one-to-nine (1–9) scale has been the subject of much debate and cause for concern. This paper contrasts the appropriateness of the 1–9 scale with other alternative 9-unit scales also used in AHP, by looking at the probability distributions of the associated priority values. For large problems, estimated probability distributions are found for the priority values through using the method of Parzen Windows.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Business (Including Economics) |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) Q Science > QA Mathematics |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Analytic hierarchy process; Multi-criteria decision making; Parzen Windows; Priority values; Scale values |
Publisher: | Elsevier |
ISSN: | 0377-2217 |
Last Modified: | 21 Oct 2022 09:50 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/37987 |
Citation Data
Cited 74 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |